Paste text or a public URL to get an AI-likelihood score with sentence-level highlights in seconds. Works on text from any AI writing tool, and your text is never stored.
How accurate is this? The score combines 10 weighted writing signals, such as sentence burstiness, vocabulary richness, and AI-typical phrases. It is an estimate, not proof of authorship. Read about false positives and responsible use before acting on any result.
10 independent statistical signals, each scored 0 to 100 for AI probability
An AI content detector estimates how likely it is that a piece of writing was produced by a large language model such as ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini. Detectors look for statistical patterns that appear more often in AI output than in human writing, then turn those patterns into a probability score.
SEO Ninja's detector measures 10 writing signals and combines them into a score from 0 to 100. It is a heuristic model: each signal is a weighted pattern check, not a language model. That means it cannot tell which AI tool wrote a text, and no score can prove who wrote something. Use it as a review and quality aid, not a verdict.
The score combines vocabulary richness, sentence burstiness, bigram entropy, word repetition, sentence-start diversity, AI-typical phrases, punctuation variety, sentence length, repeated three-word patterns, and formality. Four of the most influential are explained below.
What about perplexity? Some detectors measure perplexity, which is how predictable text is to a language model. This tool does not compute perplexity; it relies on the 10 signals above.
Sentence highlights flag AI-typical phrases and sentences in the uniform 12 to 25 word range, so they show where to look, not which sentences were machine-written. Short texts, lists, and heavily formatted content give less reliable scores.
Comparing detectors? Run the same samples, including text you know was written by a person, through each tool. Results vary widely between detectors.
| Feature | SEO Ninja AI Content Detector |
|---|---|
| Price | Free |
| Signup | Not required |
| Input | Pasted text or a public URL |
| Text length | Up to 100,000 characters |
| Output | 0 to 100 score, 10 signal scores, readability, sentence highlights |
| Report | Copy or download as plain text |
| Storage | Submitted text is not saved or cached |
| Languages | Best on English text |
Google's guidance focuses on quality, not on how content is produced. Its Search guidance says appropriate use of AI is not against its policies, while using automation to generate content mainly to manipulate rankings violates its spam policies. The scaled content abuse policy covers producing many pages mainly to game search results, whether they are made by AI, people, or both.
Google has not said it uses AI detection in ranking. What matters is whether a page is helpful, reliable, and shows real experience and expertise. Google's helpful content signals are now part of its core ranking systems rather than a separate update, so thin, unedited AI pages tend to struggle for the same reasons any low-value page does.
What this means for your SEO strategy:
AI drafts are a useful starting point, but raw output often sounds flat and generic. These edits make AI-assisted writing clearer, more specific, and more trustworthy. The goal is better content for your readers, not a lower detector score.
Every AI detector, including this one, flags some human writing as AI. Knowing the common causes helps you interpret results fairly.
Treat scores from 40 to 69 as uncertain. Even a score of 70 or higher is not proof, so review the highlighted sentences and the context before drawing conclusions.
No AI detector, including this one, is accurate enough to be the only basis for decisions about people. Do not use a score alone to accuse a student of misconduct, reject a job applicant, or penalize a writer. OpenAI withdrew its own AI text classifier in 2023, citing its low accuracy. Use detection as a prompt for a closer editorial review or a conversation, alongside drafts, sources, and the writer's own explanation.
Transparent scoring, fast results, and privacy by design.
Ten weighted writing signals, each shown with its own score, so you can see why a text scored the way it did.
Most text checks finish in seconds. URL checks take a little longer while the page is fetched.
Submitted text is analyzed and discarded. It is not saved, cached, or shared.
Check any public page. The detector fetches it and analyzes the main content.
Color-coded sentences show where AI-typical phrasing and uniform sentence patterns appear.
Copy or download a plain-text report with the score, signal breakdown, and highlights.
Use it as a writing-quality and review aid, never as the only evidence about a person's work.
Review content before publishing and check that pages read as specific, useful, and expert.
Spot generic AI phrasing in drafts and agree on editing standards with writers and clients.
Flag submissions for a closer editorial look, then decide based on sources and conversation.
Check AI-assisted drafts for flat, repetitive writing before they go through final edits.
Use a result as a prompt for conversation, never as proof. False positives are common for non-native English writers.
Find stock phrases and uniform rhythm in your drafts and improve them before delivery.
Review your own writing for generic phrasing and learn what makes writing clear and specific.
Tighten AI-assisted posts with your own examples and voice before you publish.
Direct answers to common questions about AI content detection.
Get a complete audit of your site covering technical SEO, content quality, AI optimization, and Core Web Vitals. Real recommendations, no fluff, free to start.
Get Your Free SEO Analysis Report